The OCFS has the authority to grant waivers from non-statutory requirements under certain conditions. Thus, if a requirement is mandated by statute (e.g. fingerprinting and background checks of employees of a day care center) the OCFS may not waive this requirement. As to non-statutory requirements (those found in the DSS Regulations Parts 413, 416, 417 or 418) the OCFS may waive one or more of those requirements only when: 1) the proposed waiver will not adversely affect the health, safety or well-being of children; and 2) the purpose of the regulation will still be met if the waiver is granted. In seeking a waiver, the center must describe what will be done to achieve or maintain the intended purpose of the regulation and to protect the health, safety and well-being of children. Since the OCFS generally considers the regulations to contain minimum requirements, waivers should only be sought in exceptional circumstances and the center needs to articulate clearly why compliance cannot be met and a waiver is needed. The Regulation governing waivers is 413.6. See
http://www.ocfs.state.ny.us/main/childcare/regs/413Definitions.asp#s6
The OCFS has published a form to be used when requesting a waiver (form OCFS-4887)
http://www.ocfs.state.ny.us/main/Forms/Day_Care/LRP/OCFS-LDSS-4887%20Request%20for%20Waiver.doc
When the Request for Waiver (Form OCFS 4887) is filled out, the center is required to state the period of time for which it seeks a waiver, but it cannot be for longer than 2 years (the period by which the license must be renewed). Waivers may be limited in time, at the discretion of the OCFS. A limited waiver would be appropriate, for example, if the center needs to make repairs to a door to make it comply with the local fire code (if the OCFS determined there was no compromise to the safety of the children in granting the waiver) but the center could not complete the repair work prior to the termination of its existing license because, for example, the required door was on order and had not yet been delivered. If a center needs a "perpetual" waiver (which should indeed be rare) it needs to request the waiver at the time it renews its license every two years. There is no guarantee that the OCFS will continue to grant the waiver even though it has done so in the past.
The OCFS regulations specifically require documentation of some items (more). For other matters, the regulations may not specifically require that the center keep documentation, but it is always a good idea to do so. Documentation is the "best evidence" for the OCFS to determine that a center has indeed met all statutory and regulatory requirements - - contemporaneous documentation is more credible than a verbal confirmation from the center director. Moreover, a center that is conscientious in its documentation is a sign that the center is being run in a professional and prudent manner. And, from a purely legal standpoint (beyond the OCFS licensing requirements), contemporaneous documentation can be critical in the defense of a lawsuit.
For example, the regulations (418-1.13) require that a center obtain references from three people prior to hiring an employee (at least one of whom can verify employment history, work record and qualifications, and at least one of whom can attest to the applicant’s character, habits and personal qualifications). If the center calls three references who give positive feedback on the applicant but does not document the calls adequately, how is the center going to show the OCFS that it complied with this regulation? Nor is it enough that the center write down three names and "OK" or "good" next to the name. While some documentation is better than none, this documentation lacks the specificity to demonstrate to the OCFS that the center explored with the reference those qualities of the applicant that it is required to do so. (see "Reference Worksheet" that helps guide a center through a meaningful reference check). Furthermore, if the applicant is hired and later injures a child, and the parents sue claiming that the center was negligent in hiring the person, without some meaningful level of detail in the reference-check documentation it may be more difficult for the center to defend itself against a claim for negligent hiring.
Taking the time to create meaningful documentation at the time of the event is less time consuming than dealing with later questions from the OCFS asking the center to verify compliance, from the CPS if investigating claims of an injured/abused child, or when asked detailed questions in a lawsuit about events that likely occurred years earlier.
Regulation 418-1.8(d) states that children cannot be left without competent supervision at any time. This regulation also provides for, among other things, minimum staff to children ratios based on age of the children. In order for a center to be in meaningful compliance with the regulation, staff must not only be physically present, but must be actually paying attention to the children. Staff that are chatting with each other, talking or texting on a phone, reading a book or are otherwise distracted are not supervising children. Additionally, from a legal risk standpoint, if a center allows employees to engage in distracting activities when the employees should be devoting their full attention to the children, and a child is hurt, there is a risk that a parent will claim that the center was negligent. A center’s personnel policies should specifically provide that engaging in any behavior that causes the employee to devote less than full attention to the children is in violation of the policies and can subject the employee to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including termination.